State of Maharashtra vs Vikki Suresh Pawar Advocate - Ranpise Rajesh Ramesh — 2262/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305(Kha). Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU090084452025
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
7808/2025
Filing Date
13-10-2025
Registration No
2262/2025
Registration Date
13-10-2025
Court
Civil Court,Pimpri
Judge
5-7th Jt. CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC PIMPARI
FIR Details
FIR Number
316
Police Station
Chinchwad Police Station, Chinchwad
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Vikki Suresh Pawar Advocate - Ranpise Rajesh Ramesh
Hearing History
Judge: 5-7th Jt. CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC PIMPARI
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Production of Accused
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 05-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 29-01-2026 | Hearing | |
| 17-01-2026 | Hearing | |
| 12-01-2026 | Production of Accused |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: FIR 2262/2025, Chinchwad Police Station, Pune Outcome: The witness examination in this auto-rickshaw theft case (FIR 316/2025) was completed and the court accepted the evidence. The complainant testified that his Bajaj auto-rickshaw (MH14/GC-9711) was stolen on 11/09/2025 from a servicing center where he had left it on 10/09/2025, and was later recovered by police. The accused's cross-examination revealed inconsistencies in the prosecution's case, with the accused successfully challenging the direct evidence. The case stands complete with examination concluded on 12/01/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: FIR 2262/2025, Chinchwad Police Station, Pune Outcome: The witness examination in this auto-rickshaw theft case (FIR 316/2025) was completed and the court accepted the evidence. The complainant testified that his Bajaj auto-rickshaw (MH14/GC-9711) was stolen on 11/09/2025 from a servicing center where he had left it on 10/09/2025, and was later recovered by police. The accused's cross-examination revealed inconsistencies in the prosecution's case, with the accused successfully challenging the direct evidence. The case stands complete with examination concluded on 12/01/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts