State of Maharashtra vs Vikas Baban Gade — 4092/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 22-Apr-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHPU090078862024

Filing Number

7113/2024

Filing Date

20-Dec-2024

Registration No

4092/2024

Registration Date

20-Dec-2024

Court

Civil Court,Pimpri

Judge

4-2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pimpri

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1006

Police Station

Pimpri Police Station, Pimpari

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vikas Baban Gade

Case History

  1. 22-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pimpri

  3. 12-Jan-2026

    Hearing

  4. 10-Nov-2025

    Hearing

  5. 19-Sep-2025

    Hearing

  6. 04-Aug-2025

    Hearing

  7. 18-Jun-2025

    Hearing

  8. 16-May-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

    Summary: The court rejected the accused's bail plea and dismissed the petition (Bail Application No. 4092/2024). The accused, Sandeep Madhav Jagle, was charged with illegal liquor possession and manufacturing. The court found that the investigation was properly conducted, seizure panchnama was valid, and the evidence collected was credible. The petition was dismissed as completely without merit, with no grounds for bail grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 16-May-2025

    Hearing

  10. 26-Mar-2025

    Hearing

  11. 20-Feb-2025

    Hearing

  12. 20-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 20-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4092/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the accused's bail plea and dismissed the petition (Bail Application No. 4092/2024). The accused, Sandeep Madhav Jagle, was charged with illegal liquor possession and manufacturing. The court found that the investigation was properly conducted, seizure panchnama was valid, and the evidence collected was credible. The petition was dismissed as completely without merit, with no grounds for bail grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case