State of Maharashtra vs Chandrakant kisan Dhale — 3957/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 22-Apr-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHPU090076002024

Filing Number

6851/2024

Filing Date

10-Dec-2024

Registration No

3957/2024

Registration Date

10-Dec-2024

Court

Civil Court,Pimpri

Judge

4-2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pimpri

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

276

Police Station

Excise Sub-Inspector F Division, Pimpri,

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chandrakant kisan Dhale

Case History

  1. 22-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pimpri

  3. 22-Jan-2026

    Hearing

  4. 11-Dec-2025

    Hearing

  5. 14-Oct-2025

    Hearing

  6. 19-Aug-2025

    Hearing

  7. 02-Jul-2025

    Hearing

  8. 28-Apr-2025

    Hearing

  9. 24-Mar-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

    Court Order Summary The case against accused Prakash Lalchand Chawani (52 years, Pimpri, Pune) for alleged illegal possession of liquor and plastic containers valued at ₹27,920 has been dismissed/case closed. The court found no evidence to support the charges and ruled in favor of the accused, ordering bail proceedings to be closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 24-Mar-2025

    Hearing

  11. 10-Feb-2025

    Hearing

  12. 10-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 10-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3957/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary The case against accused Prakash Lalchand Chawani (52 years, Pimpri, Pune) for alleged illegal possession of liquor and plastic containers valued at ₹27,920 has been dismissed/case closed. The court found no evidence to support the charges and ruled in favor of the accused, ordering bail proceedings to be closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case