State of Maharashtra vs Kiran Rohidas Landge and Other — 1995/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 384,385,341,323,34. Status: Unready Board. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHPU090072662025

Unready Board

Next Hearing

08th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

6690/2025

Filing Date

04-09-2025

Registration No

1995/2025

Registration Date

04-09-2025

Court

Civil Court,Pimpri

Judge

4-2nd Jt. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. And J.M.F.C PIMPRI

FIR Details

FIR Number

1112

Police Station

Pimpri Police Station, Pimpari

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 384,385,341,323,34

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

Kiran Rohidas Landge and Other

Raju Trimbak Kedari

Ramesh Gabaji Nale

Hearing History

Judge: 4-2nd Jt. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. And J.M.F.C PIMPRI

01-04-2026

Unready Board

25-03-2026

Unready Board

07-03-2026

Unready Board

13-02-2026

Unready Board

30-01-2026

Unready Board

Interim Orders

06-11-2025
Order on Exhibit

SUMMARY The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Pimpri rejected the accused's application and dismissed their objections to the charge sheet filed in Crime No. 1112/2018. The court held that the FIR was registered within the statutory limitation period (10 days from the alleged offense), so the subsequent 6.8-year delay in filing the charge sheet did not bar the proceedings under Section 468 CrPC. The court also rejected arguments regarding absence of sanction under Section 197 CrPC, finding the alleged offenses (extortion, assault, wrongful restraint) were personal crimes unrelated to official duties, and confirmed its territorial jurisdiction over the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Pimpri rejected the accused's application and dismissed their objections to the charge sheet filed in Crime No. 1112/2018. The court held that the FIR was registered within the statutory limitation period (10 days from the alleged offense), so the subsequent 6.8-year delay in filing the charge sheet did not bar the proceedings under Section 468 CrPC. The court also rejected arguments regarding absence of sanction under Section 197 CrPC, finding the alleged offenses (extortion, assault, wrongful restraint) were personal crimes unrelated to official duties, and confirmed its territorial jurisdiction over the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court,Pimpri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case