State of Maharashtra vs Kiran Rohidas Landge and Other — 1995/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 384,385,341,323,34. Status: Unready Board. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU090072662025
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
6690/2025
Filing Date
04-09-2025
Registration No
1995/2025
Registration Date
04-09-2025
Court
Civil Court,Pimpri
Judge
4-2nd Jt. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. And J.M.F.C PIMPRI
FIR Details
FIR Number
1112
Police Station
Pimpri Police Station, Pimpari
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Kiran Rohidas Landge and Other
Raju Trimbak Kedari
Ramesh Gabaji Nale
Hearing History
Judge: 4-2nd Jt. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. And J.M.F.C PIMPRI
Unready Board
Unready Board
Unready Board
Unready Board
Unready Board
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Unready Board | |
| 25-03-2026 | Unready Board | |
| 07-03-2026 | Unready Board | |
| 13-02-2026 | Unready Board | |
| 30-01-2026 | Unready Board |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Pimpri rejected the accused's application and dismissed their objections to the charge sheet filed in Crime No. 1112/2018. The court held that the FIR was registered within the statutory limitation period (10 days from the alleged offense), so the subsequent 6.8-year delay in filing the charge sheet did not bar the proceedings under Section 468 CrPC. The court also rejected arguments regarding absence of sanction under Section 197 CrPC, finding the alleged offenses (extortion, assault, wrongful restraint) were personal crimes unrelated to official duties, and confirmed its territorial jurisdiction over the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Pimpri rejected the accused's application and dismissed their objections to the charge sheet filed in Crime No. 1112/2018. The court held that the FIR was registered within the statutory limitation period (10 days from the alleged offense), so the subsequent 6.8-year delay in filing the charge sheet did not bar the proceedings under Section 468 CrPC. The court also rejected arguments regarding absence of sanction under Section 197 CrPC, finding the alleged offenses (extortion, assault, wrongful restraint) were personal crimes unrelated to official duties, and confirmed its territorial jurisdiction over the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts