RAVINDRA ANANT AMBEKAR vs Kiran Laxman Jadhav — 3514/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Unready Board. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU090069012024
e-Filing Number
07-11-2024
Filing Number
6203/2024
Filing Date
07-Nov-2024
Registration No
3514/2024
Registration Date
07-Nov-2024
Court
Civil Court,Pimpri
Judge
6-6th Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Pimpari
Last updated 06-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAVINDRA ANANT AMBEKAR
Adv. Shinde Jeetsankalp Maruti
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kiran Laxman Jadhav
Case History
-
10-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Unready Board
6th Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Pimpari
-
20-Jan-2026
Unready Board
-
07-Jan-2026
Unready Board
-
10-Dec-2025
Unready Board
-
12-Nov-2025
Unready Board
-
24-Sep-2025
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
-
19-Jul-2025
Unready Board
-
27-May-2025
Unready Board
-
09-Apr-2025
Unready Board
-
02-Apr-2025
Unready Board
-
12-Mar-2025
Unready Board
-
05-Feb-2025
Unready Board
-
11-Dec-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Pimpri (Pune) issued process against the accused on 11th December 2024 for an offence punishable under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. The court found prima facie evidence of cheque bounce offense after perusing the complaint, documents, and hearing the complainant's advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Dec-2024
Unready Board
-
27-Nov-2024
Unready Board
-
11-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 3514/2024
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Pimpri (Pune) issued process against the accused on 11th December 2024 for an offence punishable under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. The court found prima facie evidence of cheque bounce offense after perusing the complaint, documents, and hearing the complainant's advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts