Shah Plywood Through Its Partner Rajesh Shah vs SANCHIT ENTERPRISES Through Its Prop SWAPNIL KHEDKAR Advocate - Bakal Kuldeep Prakash — 2684/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act Section 138. Status: Unready Board. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU090053352024
e-Filing Number
13-09-2024
Filing Number
4759/2024
Filing Date
13-Sep-2024
Registration No
2684/2024
Registration Date
16-Sep-2024
Court
Civil Court,Pimpri
Judge
6-6th Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Pimpari
Last updated 06-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shah Plywood Through Its Partner Rajesh Shah
Adv. Adsare Atul Ramchandra
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANCHIT ENTERPRISES Through Its Prop SWAPNIL KHEDKAR Advocate - Bakal Kuldeep Prakash
Case History
-
08-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Unready Board
6th Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Pimpari
-
20-Jan-2026
Unready Board
-
07-Jan-2026
Unready Board
-
28-Nov-2025
Unready Board
-
25-Sep-2025
Unready Board
-
19-Aug-2025
Unready Board
-
12-Jun-2025
Unready Board
Jt. CIVIL Judge J. D and J.M.F.C. Pimpri
-
04-Apr-2025
Unready Board
-
21-Feb-2025
Unready Board
-
11-Feb-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The 2nd Joint JMF Court, Pimpri issued a bench warrant (BW) for Rs. 10,000 against the accused (Sanchit Enterprises/Swapnil Khedkar) due to repeated absence during proceedings. The case is pending for framing of particulars of offence, and the warrant was issued as a coercive measure to compel the accused's appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Feb-2025
Unready Board
-
05-Feb-2025
Unready Board
-
07-Jan-2025
Unready Board
-
15-Nov-2024
Unready Board
-
27-Sep-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
27-Sep-2024
Unready Board
-
23-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 2684/2024
Summary: The 2nd Joint JMF Court, Pimpri issued a bench warrant (BW) for Rs. 10,000 against the accused (Sanchit Enterprises/Swapnil Khedkar) due to repeated absence during proceedings. The case is pending for framing of particulars of offence, and the warrant was issued as a coercive measure to compel the accused's appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts