State Bank Of India Through its Chief Manager Sudhendra Pralhadrao Gumaste vs ADAK PRADIP HANUMANT — 2050/2025
Case under Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 Section 25,28,29. Status: Unready Board. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU090044772025
e-Filing Number
01-06-2025
Filing Number
4122/2025
Filing Date
02-Jun-2025
Registration No
2050/2025
Registration Date
03-Jun-2025
Court
Civil Court,Pimpri
Judge
5-7th Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Pimpari
Last updated 06-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Bank Of India Through its Chief Manager Sudhendra Pralhadrao Gumaste
Adv. Deshpande Siddharth Subhash
Respondent(s)
-
1.ADAK PRADIP HANUMANT
-
2.INDUBAI ADAK HANUMANT
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Unready Board
7th Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Pimpari
-
25-Feb-2026
Order on T.I.View PDF
-
25-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: In case SCC No. 2050/2025, the Judicial Magistrate F.C. at Pimpri, Pune (Judge G. G. Auti) issued an order on 25/02/2026 directing the issuance of process against the accused. The complainant's verification affidavit was admitted after the complainant confirmed the contents as true and correct and authenticated the signature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Feb-2026
Unready Board
7th Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Pimpari
-
18-Feb-2026
Unready Board
7th Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Pimpari
-
22-Dec-2025
Unready Board
-
11-Nov-2025
Unready Board
-
09-Sep-2025
Unready Board
-
21-Aug-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
21-Aug-2025
Unready Board
-
05-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2050/2025
Summary: In case SCC No. 2050/2025, the Judicial Magistrate F.C. at Pimpri, Pune (Judge G. G. Auti) issued an order on 25/02/2026 directing the issuance of process against the accused. The complainant's verification affidavit was admitted after the complainant confirmed the contents as true and correct and authenticated the signature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts