Mr Santosh Keshavrao Mane vs Yogesh Mangalsen Bahal Advocate - Bansal Amit Manoharlal — 36/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section Section34,Section38. Status: Unready Board. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHPU090013442025

Unready Board

Next Hearing

08th April 2026

e-Filing Number

08-02-2025

Filing Number

120/2025

Filing Date

11-02-2025

Registration No

36/2025

Registration Date

12-02-2025

Court

Civil Court,Pimpri

Judge

6-6th Jt. CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC PIMPARI

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section Section34,Section38
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section Order39Rule1and2

Petitioner(s)

Mr Santosh Keshavrao Mane

Adv. Sawant Manali Pandurang

Shyam Gopal Londhe

Adv. Sawant Manali Pandurang

Raju Sambhaji Sasane

Adv. Sawant Manali Pandurang

Respondent(s)

Yogesh Mangalsen Bahal Advocate - Bansal Amit Manoharlal

Mukesh P Patel

Adv. Bansal Amit Manoharlal,Bansal Amit Manoharlal Bansal Amit Manoharlal

Mahesh Ramesh Chaudhary

Adv. Bansal Amit Manoharlal

Chetan Babanrao Derange

Hearing History

Judge: 6-6th Jt. CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC PIMPARI

07-03-2026

Unready Board

06-02-2026

Unready Board

08-01-2026

Unready Board

25-11-2025

Unready Board

30-10-2025

Unready Board

Interim Orders

15-07-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: In RCS No. 36/2025 between Santosh Keshavrao Mane vs. Yogesh Mangalsen Bahal, the JMFC Pimpri court ordered that the case shall proceed without written statements from defendants 1-7, as they appeared in court but failed to file their written statements within the prescribed time. The matter has been directed to proceed ex parte against the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In RCS No. 36/2025 between Santosh Keshavrao Mane vs. Yogesh Mangalsen Bahal, the JMFC Pimpri court ordered that the case shall proceed without written statements from defendants 1-7, as they appeared in court but failed to file their written statements within the prescribed time. The matter has been directed to proceed ex parte against the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court,Pimpri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case