MAMTA KAMALSINGH LOHARA vs Kamal Gulabsingh Lohara Advocate - PRADHAN SAMBHAJI NARAYAN — 14/2025

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,21,22&23. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act

CNR: MHPU090007632025

e-Filing Number

21-01-2025

Filing Number

700/2025

Filing Date

21-Jan-2025

Registration No

14/2025

Registration Date

21-Jan-2025

Court

Civil Court,Pimpri

Judge

3-3rd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pimpri

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Pimpri Police Station, Pimpari

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,21,22&23

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAMTA KAMALSINGH LOHARA

    Adv. Agrawal Siddharth Dilip

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kamal Gulabsingh Lohara Advocate - PRADHAN SAMBHAJI NARAYAN

  2. 2.Darshan Gulabsingh Lohara

  3. 3.Rajkumar Gulabsing Lohara

  4. 4.Nikita Rajkumar Lohara

  5. 5.Sukhvindarsing Ramesh Lohara

  6. 6.Ritu Ramesh Lohara

  7. 7.Navin Ramesh Lohara

  8. 8.Seema Rakesh Valmiki

  9. 9.Rakesh Valmiki

  10. 10.Poonam Sachin Bhumbak

  11. 11.Sachin Bhumbak

  12. 12.Amit Prem Sitlani

  13. 13.Sayama Altaf Inamdar

  14. 14.Sagar Singh

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pimpri

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pimpri

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    PWDVA No. 14/2025 - Order Summary The court proceeded with the "No Say" applications (T.I. No. 694 and 695) despite respondents 2-4 and 8-14 failing to file their written submissions despite opportunity. The applicant was directed to take necessary steps for the appearance of respondents 5 and 6, and respondent 1 was ordered to file his assets and liability affidavit and correct the title of his reply, which was incorrectly labeled as written argument. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pimpri

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    W.S. and Say

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    W.S. and Say

  8. 04-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  9. 04-Nov-2025

    W.S. and Say

  10. 18-Sep-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  11. 18-Sep-2025

    W.S. and Say

  12. 16-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Summons

  13. 11-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Summons

  14. 12-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Summons

  15. 21-Apr-2025

    First Order

  16. 07-Apr-2025

    First Order

  17. 11-Feb-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  18. 11-Feb-2025

    First Order

  19. 10-Feb-2025

    First Order

  20. 27-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 21-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 14/2025

casestatus.in Summary

PWDVA No. 14/2025 - Order Summary The court proceeded with the "No Say" applications (T.I. No. 694 and 695) despite respondents 2-4 and 8-14 failing to file their written submissions despite opportunity. The applicant was directed to take necessary steps for the appearance of respondents 5 and 6, and respondent 1 was ordered to file his assets and liability affidavit and correct the title of his reply, which was incorrectly labeled as written argument. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case