MAMTA KAMALSINGH LOHARA vs Kamal Gulabsingh Lohara Advocate - PRADHAN SAMBHAJI NARAYAN — 14/2025
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,21,22&23. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHPU090007632025
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
21-01-2025
Filing Number
700/2025
Filing Date
21-01-2025
Registration No
14/2025
Registration Date
21-01-2025
Court
Civil Court,Pimpri
Judge
3-3rd Jt. CIVIL JUDGE J.D And J.M.F.C Pimpri
FIR Details
Police Station
Pimpri Police Station, Pimpari
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAMTA KAMALSINGH LOHARA
Adv. Agrawal Siddharth Dilip
Respondent(s)
Kamal Gulabsingh Lohara Advocate - PRADHAN SAMBHAJI NARAYAN
Darshan Gulabsingh Lohara
Rajkumar Gulabsing Lohara
Nikita Rajkumar Lohara
Sukhvindarsing Ramesh Lohara
Ritu Ramesh Lohara
Navin Ramesh Lohara
Seema Rakesh Valmiki
Rakesh Valmiki
Poonam Sachin Bhumbak
Sachin Bhumbak
Amit Prem Sitlani
Sayama Altaf Inamdar
Sagar Singh
Hearing History
Judge: 3-3rd Jt. CIVIL JUDGE J.D And J.M.F.C Pimpri
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 18-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 20-01-2026 | W.S. and Say | |
| 08-01-2026 | W.S. and Say |
Interim Orders
PWDVA No. 14/2025 - Order Summary The court proceeded with the "No Say" applications (T.I. No. 694 and 695) despite respondents 2-4 and 8-14 failing to file their written submissions despite opportunity. The applicant was directed to take necessary steps for the appearance of respondents 5 and 6, and respondent 1 was ordered to file his assets and liability affidavit and correct the title of his reply, which was incorrectly labeled as written argument. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
PWDVA No. 14/2025 - Order Summary The court proceeded with the "No Say" applications (T.I. No. 694 and 695) despite respondents 2-4 and 8-14 failing to file their written submissions despite opportunity. The applicant was directed to take necessary steps for the appearance of respondents 5 and 6, and respondent 1 was ordered to file his assets and liability affidavit and correct the title of his reply, which was incorrectly labeled as written argument. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts