State Bank Of India Through Its Chief Manager Sudhendra Pralhadrao Gumaste vs Sugriv J Jadhav — 288/2025
Case under Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 Section sec25,sec28,sec29. Status: Unready Board. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU090005232025
e-Filing Number
12-01-2025
Filing Number
487/2025
Filing Date
15-Jan-2025
Registration No
288/2025
Registration Date
17-Jan-2025
Court
Civil Court,Pimpri
Judge
5-7th Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Pimpari
Last updated 06-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Bank Of India Through Its Chief Manager Sudhendra Pralhadrao Gumaste
Adv. Deshpande Siddharth Subhash
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sugriv J Jadhav
-
2.Hema Sugriv Jadhav
Case History
-
22-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Unready Board
7th Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Pimpari
-
25-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
25-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class Court in Pimpri, Pune, issued an order on 25/02/2026 in case SCC NO. 288/2025 to issue process against the accused. The court verified the complainant's affidavit, recording that the complainant was present and admitted the contents as true and correct, with his signature duly authenticated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Feb-2026
Unready Board
7th Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Pimpari
-
13-Dec-2025
Unready Board
-
25-Nov-2025
Unready Board
-
25-Sep-2025
Unready Board
-
18-Aug-2025
Unready Board
-
26-May-2025
Unready Board
Jt. CIVIL Judge J. D and J.M.F.C. Pimpri
-
03-Apr-2025
Unready Board
Jt. CIVIL Judge J. D and J.M.F.C. Pimpri
-
07-Mar-2025
Unready Board
Jt. CIVIL Judge J. D and J.M.F.C. Pimpri
-
21-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 288/2025
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class Court in Pimpri, Pune, issued an order on 25/02/2026 in case SCC NO. 288/2025 to issue process against the accused. The court verified the complainant's affidavit, recording that the complainant was present and admitted the contents as true and correct, with his signature duly authenticated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts