State Bank Of India Through Its Chief Manager Sudhendra Pralhadrao Gumaste vs Jagdish Yadav — 285/2025
Case under Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 Section Sec25Sec28Sec29. Status: Unready Board. Next hearing: 21st May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU090005202025
e-Filing Number
12-01-2025
Filing Number
484/2025
Filing Date
15-Jan-2025
Registration No
285/2025
Registration Date
17-Jan-2025
Court
Civil Court,Pimpri
Judge
5-7th Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Pimpari
Last updated 06-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Bank Of India Through Its Chief Manager Sudhendra Pralhadrao Gumaste
Adv. DESHPANDE SIDDHARTH SUBHASH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jagdish Yadav
Case History
-
21-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Unready Board
7th Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Pimpari
-
25-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
25-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: SCC NO. 285/2025 The Judicial Magistrate F.C. Court (Court No. 7), Pimpri, Pune, ordered issuance of process against the accused on 25/02/2026. The court also verified the complainant's affidavit, with the complainant present and admitting to the truth and correctness of its contents and his signature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Feb-2026
Unready Board
7th Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Pimpari
-
13-Dec-2025
Unready Board
-
25-Nov-2025
Unready Board
-
25-Sep-2025
Unready Board
-
18-Aug-2025
Unready Board
-
26-May-2025
Unready Board
Jt. CIVIL Judge J. D and J.M.F.C. Pimpri
-
03-Apr-2025
Unready Board
Jt. CIVIL Judge J. D and J.M.F.C. Pimpri
-
07-Mar-2025
Unready Board
Jt. CIVIL Judge J. D and J.M.F.C. Pimpri
-
21-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 285/2025
Case Summary: SCC NO. 285/2025 The Judicial Magistrate F.C. Court (Court No. 7), Pimpri, Pune, ordered issuance of process against the accused on 25/02/2026. The court also verified the complainant's affidavit, with the complainant present and admitting to the truth and correctness of its contents and his signature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts