Finaleap Finserv Private Limited Through Its Authorized Representative Miss Geetanjali Vijay Shetye vs Dinesh Jagannath Parekar Proprietor of Dinesh Foot Wear — 257/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready. Next hearing: 14th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHPU090004592025

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

Next Hearing

14th May 2026

e-Filing Number

11-01-2025

Filing Number

423/2025

Filing Date

13-01-2025

Registration No

257/2025

Registration Date

15-01-2025

Court

Civil Court,Pimpri

Judge

5-7th Jt. CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC PIMPARI

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Finaleap Finserv Private Limited Through Its Authorized Representative Miss Geetanjali Vijay Shetye

Adv. PRADIP YADAV

Respondent(s)

Dinesh Jagannath Parekar Proprietor of Dinesh Foot Wear

Hearing History

Judge: 5-7th Jt. CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC PIMPARI

06-04-2026

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

07-03-2026

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

02-02-2026

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

16-12-2025

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

01-11-2025

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

Interim Orders

02-02-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court in Pimpri, Pune issued a bailable warrant of Rs. 5,000 against the accused on 02/02/2026 in case S.C.C. No. 257/2025. The warrant was issued because the accused failed to appear in court despite being served summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court in Pimpri, Pune issued a bailable warrant of Rs. 5,000 against the accused on 02/02/2026 in case S.C.C. No. 257/2025. The warrant was issued because the accused failed to appear in court despite being served summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court,Pimpri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case