State of Maharashtra vs Meena Ramesh Bhatya other 2 Advocate - Adv. Prashant Deshpande — 700301/2007
Case under Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 345. Status: Dormant File. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU080015552007
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
701653/2008
Filing Date
31-12-2007
Registration No
700301/2007
Registration Date
31-12-2007
Court
Cantonment Court, Khadki
Judge
1-J.M.F.C. KHADKI CONTT.
FIR Details
FIR Number
3231
Police Station
BHOSARI POLICE CHOWKI DAPODI
Year
2007
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Meena Ramesh Bhatya other 2 Advocate - Adv. Prashant Deshpande
Manisha Sachin Patil
Jayshree Harish Khatri
Manisha Sachin Patil
Adv. Nalawade
Hearing History
Judge: 1-J.M.F.C. KHADKI CONTT.
Dormant File
Dormant File
Dormant File
Dormant File
Dormant File
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Dormant File | |
| 07-03-2026 | Dormant File | |
| 16-02-2026 | Dormant File | |
| 16-01-2026 | Dormant File | |
| 17-12-2025 | Dormant File |
Interim Orders
Summary Accused Meena Ramesh Bhatiya and Jayashri Harish Khatri were acquitted of charges under Sections 3, 4, and 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. The court found insufficient evidence and credibility issues with the prosecution case, noting lack of independent witnesses, discrepancies in testimonies, and missing corroborating documentation. The case against the third accused, Manisha Sachin Patil (who remained absent), was ordered to proceed separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Accused Meena Ramesh Bhatiya and Jayashri Harish Khatri were acquitted of charges under Sections 3, 4, and 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. The court found insufficient evidence and credibility issues with the prosecution case, noting lack of independent witnesses, discrepancies in testimonies, and missing corroborating documentation. The case against the third accused, Manisha Sachin Patil (who remained absent), was ordered to proceed separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts