Sadiya Arif Mansuri vs Arif Gulam Ali Mansuri Advocate - Deshmukh Iliyas Altaf — 42/2024
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHPU080007822024
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
13-06-2024
Filing Number
780/2024
Filing Date
20-06-2024
Registration No
42/2024
Registration Date
20-06-2024
Court
Cantonment Court, Khadki
Judge
1-J.M.F.C. KHADKI CONTT.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sadiya Arif Mansuri
Adv. Shikh Amjad Sultan
Respondent(s)
Arif Gulam Ali Mansuri Advocate - Deshmukh Iliyas Altaf
Gulamali Mansuri
Adv. Deshmukh Iliyas Altaf
Vajida Gulamali Mansuri
Adv. Deshmukh Iliyas Altaf
Varisali Gulamali Mansuri
Adv. Deshmukh Iliyas Altaf
Zarina Gulamali Mansuri
Adv. Deshmukh Iliyas Altaf
Hearing History
Judge: 1-J.M.F.C. KHADKI CONTT.
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 30-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 13-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 09-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In PWDVA Application No. 42/2024 (Sadiya vs. Arif), the court dismissed the application to dismiss the main application after the applicant filed an affidavit of assets and liabilities. The respondents were directed to file their response along with assets and liabilities on the next date. Additionally, an application seeking a no-say order against the respondents was rejected as the applicant had now submitted the required affidavit, and the matter was fixed for the respondent's reply with supporting documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In PWDVA Application No. 42/2024 (Sadiya vs. Arif), the court dismissed the application to dismiss the main application after the applicant filed an affidavit of assets and liabilities. The respondents were directed to file their response along with assets and liabilities on the next date. Additionally, an application seeking a no-say order against the respondents was rejected as the applicant had now submitted the required affidavit, and the matter was fixed for the respondent's reply with supporting documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts