DINESH KERABA SUKALE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — 85/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

Reply/Say Next hearing 08-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHPU080005842025

e-Filing Number

21-03-2025

Filing Number

584/2025

Filing Date

26-Mar-2025

Registration No

85/2025

Registration Date

26-Mar-2025

Court

Cantonment Court, Khadki

Judge

1-J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

VISHRANTWADI POLICE STATION

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DINESH KERABA SUKALE

    Adv. ATTAR JAKEERA MOHMMAD HANIF

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. 08-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  10. 06-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  11. 29-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  12. 29-Dec-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  13. 20-Dec-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  14. 12-Dec-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  15. 04-Dec-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  16. 27-Nov-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  17. 21-Nov-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  18. 17-Nov-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  19. 12-Nov-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  20. 29-Oct-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  21. 15-Oct-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  22. 09-Oct-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  23. 03-Oct-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  24. 30-Sep-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  25. 25-Sep-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  26. 22-Sep-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  27. 16-Sep-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  28. 12-Sep-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  29. 03-Sep-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  30. 28-Aug-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  31. 22-Aug-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  32. 14-Aug-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case: Dinesh Vs. State (Cri. M.A. No. 85/2025) The application was adjourned. The court found it necessary to hear the account holder whose bank account has been frozen by the investigating agency before deciding the matter, and accordingly issued notice to the account holder. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  33. 14-Aug-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  34. 05-Aug-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  35. 29-Jul-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  36. 22-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  37. 22-Jul-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  38. 15-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  39. 11-Jul-2025

    Reply/Say

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  40. 21-May-2025

    First Order

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  41. 09-May-2025

    First Order

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  42. 11-Apr-2025

    First Order

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  43. 07-Apr-2025

    First Order

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  44. 28-Mar-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  45. 28-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  46. 26-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 85/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case: Dinesh Vs. State (Cri. M.A. No. 85/2025) The application was adjourned. The court found it necessary to hear the account holder whose bank account has been frozen by the investigating agency before deciding the matter, and accordingly issued notice to the account holder. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case