Shital Pandurang Chavan vs Pandurang Vishwanath Chavan Advocate - - — 26/2024
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,17,18,19,20,22,23. Status: For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHPU080005502024
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
e-Filing Number
30-04-2024
Filing Number
548/2024
Filing Date
02-05-2024
Registration No
26/2024
Registration Date
02-05-2024
Court
Cantonment Court, Khadki
Judge
12-2nd Joint Judicial Magistrate First Class Khadki Pune
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shital Pandurang Chavan
Adv. ADHAV SUVARNA SHAMKUMAR
Aaradhya Pandurang Chavan
Adv. ADHAV SUVARNA SHAMKUMAR
Respondent(s)
Pandurang Vishwanath Chavan Advocate - -
Hearing History
Judge: 12-2nd Joint Judicial Magistrate First Class Khadki Pune
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready | |
| 28-01-2026 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready | |
| 23-12-2025 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready | |
| 20-11-2025 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready | |
| 10-10-2025 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: Case 1 (PWDVA Appln./26/2024): The case of Shital Pandurang Chavan vs. Pandurang Vishwanath Chavan was ordered to proceed without the respondent's reply. Although the respondent appeared through vakalatnama on 01.08.2024, they failed to file a reply, indicating disinterest in defending the case. Case 2 (PWDVA Appln. No. 79/2023): The respondent's application requesting a proper copy of the petition was dismissed/rejected. The court found that the main petition and documents were properly uploaded on the CIS e-filing platform, and the respondent's claim that page 2 was missing lacked merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Case 1 (PWDVA Appln./26/2024): The case of Shital Pandurang Chavan vs. Pandurang Vishwanath Chavan was ordered to proceed without the respondent's reply. Although the respondent appeared through vakalatnama on 01.08.2024, they failed to file a reply, indicating disinterest in defending the case. Case 2 (PWDVA Appln. No. 79/2023): The respondent's application requesting a proper copy of the petition was dismissed/rejected. The court found that the main petition and documents were properly uploaded on the CIS e-filing platform, and the respondent's claim that page 2 was missing lacked merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts