Nitin Mahadeo Bhawar vs Sanjay Daniel Tribhuvan Advocate - Pathan Shabbir Khash Khan — 54/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 237,322,335,336(3),340. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHPU080003522025

e-Filing Number

14-02-2025

Filing Number

352/2025

Filing Date

20-Feb-2025

Registration No

54/2025

Registration Date

24-Feb-2025

Court

Cantonment Court, Khadki

Judge

2-Jt. J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

KHADAKI POLICE STATION

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 237,322,335,336(3),340
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 175(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nitin Mahadeo Bhawar

    Adv. Shukla Krupashankar Mathuraprasad

  2. 2.Prashant Ashok Jadhav

    Adv. KRIPASHANKAR SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sanjay Daniel Tribhuvan Advocate - Pathan Shabbir Khash Khan

  2. 2.Prachur Sah

    Adv. Moon Pranali Dadaji

  3. 3.Sanjay Nigam

    Adv. INDERJITSINGH BAGHSINGH GILL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court dismissed the complaint under Section 226 of B.N.S.S. due to fundamental defects in the complaint's title clause. The court held that the Satya River Co-Operative Housing Society should have been made the primary complainant instead of its individual officers, and M/s Indus Towers Ltd. should have been named as the main accused rather than its individual representatives, citing Supreme Court precedent that company officers cannot be held vicariously liable without specific allegations of their individual roles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt. J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  5. 09-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt. J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  6. 02-Dec-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt. J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  7. 17-Nov-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt. J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  8. 29-Oct-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt. J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  9. 26-Sep-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt. J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  10. 28-Aug-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt. J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  11. 28-Jul-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt. J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  12. 09-Jul-2025

    First Order

    Jt. J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  13. 20-Jun-2025

    First Order

    Jt. J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  14. 24-Apr-2025

    First Order

    J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  15. 17-Mar-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  16. 17-Mar-2025

    First Order

    Jt. J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.

  17. 12-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 20-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 54/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the complaint under Section 226 of B.N.S.S. due to fundamental defects in the complaint's title clause. The court held that the Satya River Co-Operative Housing Society should have been made the primary complainant instead of its individual officers, and M/s Indus Towers Ltd. should have been named as the main accused rather than its individual representatives, citing Supreme Court precedent that company officers cannot be held vicariously liable without specific allegations of their individual roles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case