Sanjay Ramkrushna Kachi vs Rajiv Ramkrushna Kachi and 1 Advocate - Karnawat Mahendra Jivraj — 127/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 16th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU080003232022
Next Hearing
16th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
323/2022
Filing Date
07-03-2022
Registration No
127/2022
Registration Date
08-03-2022
Court
Cantonment Court, Khadki
Judge
1-J.M.F.C. KHADKI CONTT.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sanjay Ramkrushna Kachi
Adv. Indrajeet Dongare
Respondent(s)
Rajiv Ramkrushna Kachi and 1 Advocate - Karnawat Mahendra Jivraj
Anuradha Ramkrush Kachi
Adv. Karnawat Mahendra Jivraj
Hearing History
Judge: 1-J.M.F.C. KHADKI CONTT.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 20-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 01-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a criminal case (FIR No. 127/2022) from a Pune court involving charges under IPC Sections 2/7(b) and 77/5(a)/1(b). The court heard the complainant's detailed account of alleged assault and property disputes involving multiple incidents between June 2021 and September 2021. The court dismissed the petition, finding insufficient grounds to proceed against the accused and noting inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony regarding the severity of injuries and medical evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a criminal case (FIR No. 127/2022) from a Pune court involving charges under IPC Sections 2/7(b) and 77/5(a)/1(b). The court heard the complainant's detailed account of alleged assault and property disputes involving multiple incidents between June 2021 and September 2021. The court dismissed the petition, finding insufficient grounds to proceed against the accused and noting inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony regarding the severity of injuries and medical evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts