Government of Maharashtra vs Rohit Prakash Jadhav — 4/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,115(2),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU080000152026
e-Filing Number
06-01-2026
Filing Number
15/2026
Filing Date
07-Jan-2026
Registration No
4/2026
Registration Date
07-Jan-2026
Court
Cantonment Court, Khadki
Judge
2-Jt. J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
122
Police Station
KHADAKI POLICE STATION
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rohit Prakash Jadhav
-
2.Asha Prakash Jadhav
Adv. null
-
3.Prakash Bapu Jadhav
Adv. null
-
4.Shubhangi Prakash Jadhav
Adv. null
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
07-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary In this March 7, 2026 judgment from Khadki Court, Pune, the court acquitted all four defendants (Rohit Prakash Jadhav, Prakash Bapu Jadhav, Asha Prakash Jadhav, and Subhangi Prakash Jadhav) of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2), and 3(5), relating to alleged domestic violence and harassment of the complainant. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, noting the complainant's lack of credibility after admitting to an out-of-court settlement with the defendants and indicating her intention to return to live with them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. J.M.F.C. Khadki Contt.
-
02-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2026
Case Summary In this March 7, 2026 judgment from Khadki Court, Pune, the court acquitted all four defendants (Rohit Prakash Jadhav, Prakash Bapu Jadhav, Asha Prakash Jadhav, and Subhangi Prakash Jadhav) of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2), and 3(5), relating to alleged domestic violence and harassment of the complainant. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, noting the complainant's lack of credibility after admitting to an out-of-court settlement with the defendants and indicating her intention to return to live with them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts