RPF Shivajinagar vs Raju Anna Gaikwad Advocate - Nawadkar Amol Tanaji — 31/2024

Case under Railway Act, 1989 Section 3(a)RP(UP), 147. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 14th May 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHPU070010352024

Evidence

Next Hearing

14th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1035/2024

Filing Date

08-02-2024

Registration No

31/2024

Registration Date

08-02-2024

Court

Railway Court,Pune

Judge

1-J.M.F.C. Railway CourtPune

FIR Details

FIR Number

01

Police Station

R.P.F. Station Shivajinagar Pune

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Railway Act, 1989 Section 3(a)RP(UP), 147

Petitioner(s)

RPF Shivajinagar

Adv. app

Respondent(s)

Raju Anna Gaikwad Advocate - Nawadkar Amol Tanaji

Hearing History

Judge: 1-J.M.F.C. Railway CourtPune

01-04-2026

Evidence

20-03-2026

Production of Accused

07-03-2026

Production of Accused

11-12-2025

N.B.W._Unready

08-10-2025

N.B.W._Unready

Interim Orders

01-04-2026
Charge

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Railway Court Pune, issued a formal charge against Raju Anna Gaikwad (age 50, laborer) on 01/04/2026 for unlawful possession of copper cable (Rs. 3000/-) railway property under Section 3(a) of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966, and trespass under Section 147 of the Railways Act, 1989, allegedly committed on 21/12/2023 at Khadki Railway Platform. The accused has been directed to stand trial on these charges, and the charge contents were read to him in his vernacular language. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Railway Court Pune, issued a formal charge against Raju Anna Gaikwad (age 50, laborer) on 01/04/2026 for unlawful possession of copper cable (Rs. 3000/-) railway property under Section 3(a) of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966, and trespass under Section 147 of the Railways Act, 1989, allegedly committed on 21/12/2023 at Khadki Railway Platform. The accused has been directed to stand trial on these charges, and the charge contents were read to him in his vernacular language. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Railway Court,Pune All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case