Pune Municipal Corporation Through Shri Balasaheb Dolas vs Shri Arvind Lele Secretary Advocate - Jadhav Sachin Tanajirao — 79/2024
Case under Maharashtra (urban Areas) Protection and Preservation of Trees Act, 1975 Section Section8(1)21(1). Status: Stayed by District Court. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU050001002024
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
24-12-2024
Filing Number
100/2024
Filing Date
24-12-2024
Registration No
79/2024
Registration Date
24-12-2024
Court
Civil Court,Pmc
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PMC PUNE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pune Municipal Corporation Through Shri Balasaheb Dolas
Adv. PATIL SHIVAJI JANARDHANRAO
Respondent(s)
Shri Arvind Lele Secretary Advocate - Jadhav Sachin Tanajirao
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PMC PUNE
Stayed by District Court
Plea / Particulars
Plea / Particulars
B.W._Unready
Appearance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Stayed by District Court | |
| 07-03-2026 | Plea / Particulars | |
| 16-02-2026 | Plea / Particulars | |
| 06-02-2026 | B.W._Unready | |
| 31-01-2026 | Appearance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 79/2024 The court passed three orders on 16.02.2026 before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Pune. First, the bailable warrant issued against accused Arvind Lele was canceled subject to a penalty of Rs. 200/-. Subsequently, the accused was granted bail on executing personal bond and surety bond of Rs. 15,000/- each. Finally, the court modified the bail to allow the accused's release on cash security of Rs. 5,000/- instead, as he had no available surety of the required amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 79/2024 The court passed three orders on 16.02.2026 before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Pune. First, the bailable warrant issued against accused Arvind Lele was canceled subject to a penalty of Rs. 200/-. Subsequently, the accused was granted bail on executing personal bond and surety bond of Rs. 15,000/- each. Finally, the court modified the bail to allow the accused's release on cash security of Rs. 5,000/- instead, as he had no available surety of the required amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts