Pune Municipal Corporation through Dnynoba Shankar Balwadkar vs Kavita Vilas Lonkar Advocate - S. V. Bhosale — 1/2021

Case under Maharashtra (urban Areas) Protection and Preservation of Trees Act, 1975 Section 8(1) 21(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHPU050000012021

Evidence

Next Hearing

15th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1/2021

Filing Date

08-01-2021

Registration No

1/2021

Registration Date

20-01-2021

Court

Civil Court,Pmc

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PMC PUNE

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra (Urban Areas) Protection and Preservation of Trees Act, 1975 Section 8(1) 21(1)

Petitioner(s)

Pune Municipal Corporation through Dnynoba Shankar Balwadkar

Adv. Patil Shivajirao Janardanrao

Respondent(s)

Kavita Vilas Lonkar Advocate - S. V. Bhosale

Savita Santosh Lonkar

Adv. S. V. Bhosale

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PMC PUNE

02-04-2026

Evidence

24-03-2026

Evidence

07-03-2026

Evidence

06-02-2026

Evidence

21-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

03-08-2022
Plea

Case Summary The Pune Municipal Corporation filed a complaint against two accused persons (Kavita Vilas Lonkar and Savita Santosh Mammale) for unlawfully cutting down 11 trees (1 Umbar, 7 Peru, 2 Sitafal, and 1 Ramfal) without authority on 10/01/2020, violating the Maharashtra (Urban Areas) Protection and Preservation of Trees Act, 1975. On 03/08/2022, both accused pleaded not guilty to the charges after understanding the particulars of the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Pune Municipal Corporation filed a complaint against two accused persons (Kavita Vilas Lonkar and Savita Santosh Mammale) for unlawfully cutting down 11 trees (1 Umbar, 7 Peru, 2 Sitafal, and 1 Ramfal) without authority on 10/01/2020, violating the Maharashtra (Urban Areas) Protection and Preservation of Trees Act, 1975. On 03/08/2022, both accused pleaded not guilty to the charges after understanding the particulars of the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court,Pmc All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case