The State of Maharashtra Through CBI, ACB P. Stn. vs Naresh Kishtu Badawath etc Advocate - Zaid A. Qureshi — 18/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 120-B. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHPU010210362023
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
12086/2023
Filing Date
21-12-2023
Registration No
18/2024
Registration Date
06-01-2024
Court
District and Session Court ,Pune
Judge
3-DISTRICT JUDGE -14 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
FIR Details
FIR Number
6
Police Station
C. B. I.
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through CBI, ACB P. Stn.
Adv. PP A. D. Arikar
Respondent(s)
Naresh Kishtu Badawath etc Advocate - Zaid A. Qureshi
Jaykumar Narayan Thorat
Adv. Pardeshi Pratap Vasant
Shoaib Raju Shaikh
Adv. Hasmani Imran H
Hearing History
Judge: 3-DISTRICT JUDGE -14 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 07-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 11-02-2026 | Charge | |
| 21-01-2026 | Charge | |
| 03-01-2026 | Charge |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: CBI vs. Naresh and others (Spl. Case No. 18/2024) Date: 05th August, 2025 Outcome: The discharge application filed by accused No. 3 Shoaib Raju Shaikh has been rejected. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of his involvement in conspiracy under Section 120B IPC read with Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, based on incriminating recorded conversations showing he acted as a middleman in negotiating bribe amounts with co-accused Naresh Badhawat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: CBI vs. Naresh and others (Spl. Case No. 18/2024) Date: 05th August, 2025 Outcome: The discharge application filed by accused No. 3 Shoaib Raju Shaikh has been rejected. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of his involvement in conspiracy under Section 120B IPC read with Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, based on incriminating recorded conversations showing he acted as a middleman in negotiating bribe amounts with co-accused Naresh Badhawat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts