The State of Maharashtra Through Sahakar Nagar Police Station vs Krushna Kondiba Shimple etc. — 2/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64,64(2)(f),70,351(2)(3),3(5). Status: Charge. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHPU010207402025
Next Hearing
13th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
13537/2025
Filing Date
29-12-2025
Registration No
2/2026
Registration Date
01-01-2026
Court
District and Session Court ,Pune
Judge
12-DISTRICT JUDGE -8 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
FIR Details
FIR Number
4
Police Station
Sahakarnagar Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through Sahakar Nagar Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Krushna Kondiba Shimple etc.
Navnath Limbaji Dugane
Adv. Salave Manuja Ramesh
Hearing History
Judge: 12-DISTRICT JUDGE -8 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Charge
Order
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 23-03-2026 | Order | |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 07-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 04-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: Accused No. 2 Navnath Limbaji Dugane's bail application in a gang rape case (Crime No. 4/2025, Sahkarnagar Police Station, Pune) was granted. The court ordered his release on regular bail with a PR bond of Rs. 50,000 and surety of equal amount, imposing stringent conditions including no contact with the victim/witnesses, non-tampering with evidence, and restrictions on leaving Maharashtra without permission. The court considered case pendency, similar role to co-accused already released by High Court, and lack of independent witnesses in making this decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: Accused No. 2 Navnath Limbaji Dugane's bail application in a gang rape case (Crime No. 4/2025, Sahkarnagar Police Station, Pune) was granted. The court ordered his release on regular bail with a PR bond of Rs. 50,000 and surety of equal amount, imposing stringent conditions including no contact with the victim/witnesses, non-tampering with evidence, and restrictions on leaving Maharashtra without permission. The court considered case pendency, similar role to co-accused already released by High Court, and lack of independent witnesses in making this decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts