The State of Maharashtra through Sangvi P. Stn. vs Umesh Shivaji Rajguru Advocate - Iftekar H. Kotwal — 38/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376(3),376(2)(i),506. Disposed: Uncontested--TRANSFERRED / MADE OVER on 25th January 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHPU010204372024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
11602/2024
Filing Date
23-12-2024
Registration No
38/2025
Registration Date
04-01-2025
Court
District and Session Court ,Pune
Judge
12-DISTRICT JUDGE -10 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Decision Date
25th January 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--TRANSFERRED / MADE OVER
FIR Details
FIR Number
441
Police Station
SANGVI POLICE STATION
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra through Sangvi P. Stn.
Adv. Spl. PP
Respondent(s)
Umesh Shivaji Rajguru Advocate - Iftekar H. Kotwal
Hearing History
Judge: 12-DISTRICT JUDGE -10 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Disposed
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-01-2026 | Disposed | |
| 19-01-2026 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 03-01-2026 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 17-12-2025 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 27-11-2025 | Hearing Before Charge |
Interim Orders
Summary The court rejected the second bail application of 18-year-old Umesh Rajguru, accused of raping a 13-year-old girl on March 28, 2024. The judge held that given the serious nature of the offense under IPC Section 376(3) and POCSO Act Section 4, the victim's young age, medical evidence supporting the prosecution's case, and the victim's strong opposition to bail, the accused is not entitled to release on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court rejected the second bail application of 18-year-old Umesh Rajguru, accused of raping a 13-year-old girl on March 28, 2024. The judge held that given the serious nature of the offense under IPC Section 376(3) and POCSO Act Section 4, the victim's young age, medical evidence supporting the prosecution's case, and the victim's strong opposition to bail, the accused is not entitled to release on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts