The State of Maharashtra Shirur P. Stn. vs Santosh Kisan Kokade — 973/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354(A). Disposed: Uncontested--TRANSFERRED / MADE OVER on 25th January 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHPU010190682021

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

11739/2021

Filing Date

13-12-2021

Registration No

973/2021

Registration Date

14-12-2021

Court

District and Session Court ,Pune

Judge

12-DISTRICT JUDGE -10 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE

Decision Date

25th January 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--TRANSFERRED / MADE OVER

FIR Details

FIR Number

797

Police Station

Shirur Police Station

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 354(A)
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 8,12

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra Shirur P. Stn.

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Santosh Kisan Kokade

Hearing History

Judge: 12-DISTRICT JUDGE -10 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE

25-01-2026

Disposed

20-01-2026

Charge

18-11-2025

Charge

15-10-2025

Charge

01-10-2025

N.B.W._Unready

Interim Orders

06-01-2022
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court granted bail to accused Santosh Kisan Kokade in a POCSO case involving alleged sexual assault of a minor girl. Despite direct allegations under IPC Section 354-A and POCSO Act Sections 8 and 12, the court allowed bail considering the prescribed punishment, prolonged incarceration, and pandemic-related trial delays, imposing strict conditions including a Rs. 25,000 PR bond, no contact with the victim, and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted bail to accused Santosh Kisan Kokade in a POCSO case involving alleged sexual assault of a minor girl. Despite direct allegations under IPC Section 354-A and POCSO Act Sections 8 and 12, the court allowed bail considering the prescribed punishment, prolonged incarceration, and pandemic-related trial delays, imposing strict conditions including a Rs. 25,000 PR bond, no contact with the victim, and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court ,Pune All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case