Fareed Mohamad Saheb Dec. through Lrs Mohamad Fareed Saheb Qureshi vs The Union of India Through Divisional Railway Manager, Pune etc Advocate - Salunkhe Mangala Ganpatrao — 4/2021
Case under Public Premises (eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act Section 9. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
Civil Appeal PPE - Civil Appeal under Public Premises Act
CNR: MHPU010184432021
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
7886/2021
Filing Date
03-12-2021
Registration No
4/2021
Registration Date
07-12-2021
Court
District and Session Court ,Pune
Judge
17-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Fareed Mohamad Saheb Dec. through Lrs Mohamad Fareed Saheb Qureshi
Adv. K. M. Chakranarayan
Respondent(s)
The Union of India Through Divisional Railway Manager, Pune etc Advocate - Salunkhe Mangala Ganpatrao
The Estates Officer, Central Railway, Pune thorugh The Divisional Railway Manager, Pune.
Adv. Salunkhe Mangala Ganpatrao
Hearing History
Judge: 17-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 16-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 22-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-12-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary The District Court rejected the application for appointment of a court receiver filed by the legal representative of deceased Fareed Mohammad. The appellant challenged an eviction order (dated 10/11/2021) from railway land in Pune and sought either a receiver appointment to collect license fees or directions to accept pending payments. The court dismissed the application, finding that respondents' allegation of unauthorized occupation precluded any direction to accept license fees, and that appointing a receiver was inappropriate under the Portable Protected Establishment (PPE) Act framework. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District Court rejected the application for appointment of a court receiver filed by the legal representative of deceased Fareed Mohammad. The appellant challenged an eviction order (dated 10/11/2021) from railway land in Pune and sought either a receiver appointment to collect license fees or directions to accept pending payments. The court dismissed the application, finding that respondents' allegation of unauthorized occupation precluded any direction to accept license fees, and that appointing a receiver was inappropriate under the Portable Protected Establishment (PPE) Act framework. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts