The State of Maharashtra Through Saswad P.Stn. vs Pradip Bhaiyyalal Bisen etc Advocate - Adv. G.S. Limbekar — 1125/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 395,392,34. Status: Awaiting Muddemal. Next hearing: 11th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHPU010184102023
Next Hearing
11th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
10767/2023
Filing Date
06-11-2023
Registration No
1125/2023
Registration Date
08-11-2023
Court
District and Session Court ,Pune
Judge
17-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
FIR Details
FIR Number
174
Police Station
Saswad Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through Saswad P.Stn.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Pradip Bhaiyyalal Bisen etc Advocate - Adv. G.S. Limbekar
Pavan Jagdish Vishwakarma
Subhash Bandu Meshram (C.R.P.C.
Vishnu Pandit Alias Vidanvasani Pande (CRPC
Manish Bechan Kumar (C.R.P.C.
Hearing History
Judge: 17-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Awaiting Muddemal
Awaiting Muddemal
Awaiting Muddemal
Awaiting Muddemal
Awaiting Muddemal
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal | |
| 07-03-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal | |
| 20-02-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal | |
| 05-02-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal | |
| 22-01-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal |
Interim Orders
Summary: The bail application filed by accused Pradip Bhaiyyalal Bisen for offences under IPC Sections 392, 395, 34 and Arms Act Section 3(25) was rejected/denied. The court found that the accused, involved in armed robbery and dacoity cases, posed a flight risk (being a resident of Gondia) and a danger of repeating crimes; moreover, with only 13 prosecution witnesses, trial could conclude promptly, making continued detention appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The bail application filed by accused Pradip Bhaiyyalal Bisen for offences under IPC Sections 392, 395, 34 and Arms Act Section 3(25) was rejected/denied. The court found that the accused, involved in armed robbery and dacoity cases, posed a flight risk (being a resident of Gondia) and a danger of repeating crimes; moreover, with only 13 prosecution witnesses, trial could conclude promptly, making continued detention appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts