The State of Maharashtra Baramati Taluka P.stn. vs Prashant Popatrao More etc Advocate - Shah Sudhir Maniklal — 921/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,120(B),504,506,34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHPU010179612021
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
11153/2021
Filing Date
27-11-2021
Registration No
921/2021
Registration Date
29-11-2021
Court
District and Session Court ,Pune
Judge
8-DISTRICT JUDGE -6 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
FIR Details
FIR Number
350
Police Station
Baramati Taluka Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Baramati Taluka P.stn.
Adv. Spl APP Ujjawala Pawar
Respondent(s)
Prashant Popatrao More etc Advocate - Shah Sudhir Maniklal
Vinod Alias Tom Popatrao More
Akash Prashant More (Juvenile)
Rahul Alias Ribel Krishnat Yadav
Adv. Salunke Sanket Shivaji
Ajinkya Alias Pappu Suresh Bhosale
Jaydeep Dilip Taware (Suspect)
Adv. Gawade Prasad Gulabrao
Hearing History
Judge: 8-DISTRICT JUDGE -6 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 17-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Status Summary: In Special MCOCA Case No. 921/2021, the court adjourned the trial to 02/04/2026 for examination of further witnesses. Accused Ajinkya @ Pappu Bhosale repeatedly insisted on pleading guilty despite prior warnings; the court found his disruptive behavior disrespectful to judicial authority. The court ordered the accused to be produced on 02/04/2026 for recording his plea of guilty and passing sentencing orders in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Status Summary: In Special MCOCA Case No. 921/2021, the court adjourned the trial to 02/04/2026 for examination of further witnesses. Accused Ajinkya @ Pappu Bhosale repeatedly insisted on pleading guilty despite prior warnings; the court found his disruptive behavior disrespectful to judicial authority. The court ordered the accused to be produced on 02/04/2026 for recording his plea of guilty and passing sentencing orders in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts