The State of Maharashtra Warje Malwadi P Stn vs Vikas Dattatray Shirsat etc — 803/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 141,143,144,148,149,326,307,427. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHPU010141812017
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
7241/2017
Filing Date
09-11-2017
Registration No
803/2017
Registration Date
09-11-2017
Court
District and Session Court ,Pune
Judge
17-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
FIR Details
FIR Number
297
Police Station
WARJE MALWADI POLICE STATION
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Warje Malwadi P Stn
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vikas Dattatray Shirsat etc
Vicki Vijay Kalekar
Akash Vijay Kalekar
Dada alias Dadya Nathu Kalekar
Ganesh Vilas Wanjale
Sachin alias Kalya Ankush Yenpure
Sunil Ashok Gunjal
Hearing History
Judge: 17-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 12-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Pune rejected the third bail application of accused Akash Vijay Kalekar filed under Section 439 CrPC for serious offenses including rioting, causing grievous hurt, and attempted murder (Crime No. 297/2017). The court found that Kalekar is a habitual offender with multiple pending criminal cases and determined that bail should be denied due to the serious nature of the charges, risk of witness intimidation, and likelihood of absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Pune rejected the third bail application of accused Akash Vijay Kalekar filed under Section 439 CrPC for serious offenses including rioting, causing grievous hurt, and attempted murder (Crime No. 297/2017). The court found that Kalekar is a habitual offender with multiple pending criminal cases and determined that bail should be denied due to the serious nature of the charges, risk of witness intimidation, and likelihood of absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts