The State of Maharashtra Through Kondhwa pstn vs Shailesh Rampyare Sharma Advocate - Shaikh Salman Jabbar — 718/2021

Case under Information Technology Act Section 67(B). Status: Hearing Before Charge. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHPU010136952021

Hearing Before Charge

Next Hearing

18th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

8528/2021

Filing Date

21-09-2021

Registration No

718/2021

Registration Date

23-09-2021

Court

District and Session Court ,Pune

Judge

12-DISTRICT JUDGE -8 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE

FIR Details

FIR Number

135

Police Station

Kondwa Police Station

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Information Technology Act Section 67(B)
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 14(1)

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra Through Kondhwa pstn

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Shailesh Rampyare Sharma Advocate - Shaikh Salman Jabbar

Hearing History

Judge: 12-DISTRICT JUDGE -8 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE

07-03-2026

Hearing Before Charge

17-01-2026

Hearing Before Charge

27-11-2025

Hearing Before Charge

09-10-2025

Charge

28-08-2025

Charge

Interim Orders

13-09-2023
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The accused's Section 277 CrPC discharge application was rejected and dismissed. The court found prima facie sufficient grounds to proceed against the accused based on cyber cell evidence, IP address tracing, mobile phone records, and the witness statement establishing that obscene child videos were uploaded from the accused's mobile phone without the witness's knowledge. The case will proceed to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The accused's Section 277 CrPC discharge application was rejected and dismissed. The court found prima facie sufficient grounds to proceed against the accused based on cyber cell evidence, IP address tracing, mobile phone records, and the witness statement establishing that obscene child videos were uploaded from the accused's mobile phone without the witness's knowledge. The case will proceed to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court ,Pune All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case