The State of Maharashtra Mundhwa P Stn vs Pranav Vilas Datar etc 4 Advocate - Shah S M, Bhoite D S — 754/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,354,506,504,323,143,144,149. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: MHPU010131462017

Arguments

Next Hearing

07th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

6735/2017

Filing Date

13-10-2017

Registration No

754/2017

Registration Date

13-10-2017

Court

District and Session Court ,Pune

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE

FIR Details

FIR Number

199

Police Station

Mundhwa Police Station

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 307,354,506,504,323,143,144,149

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra Mundhwa P Stn

Adv. Shri. Anilkumar Varma - APP

Respondent(s)

Pranav Vilas Datar etc 4 Advocate - Shah S M, Bhoite D S

Amogh Ajit Ranade

Gurbirsingh Dharambirsingh Lamba

Prashant alias Bala Madhav Mandekar

Aditya Nitin Kandhare

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE

28-03-2026

Arguments

23-03-2026

Arguments

16-03-2026

Arguments

07-03-2026

Arguments

27-02-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

07-10-2024
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The application (Exh. 76) filed by the accused in Sessions Case No. 754/2017 (charge under IPC Section 307) has been allowed. The accused is permitted to file a passport application for 10 years as per regulations, given that he is a permanent resident of Pune, currently on bail, and requires travel for business purposes. The accused must attend all court hearings without default or be represented by a duly instructed advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application (Exh. 76) filed by the accused in Sessions Case No. 754/2017 (charge under IPC Section 307) has been allowed. The accused is permitted to file a passport application for 10 years as per regulations, given that he is a permanent resident of Pune, currently on bail, and requires travel for business purposes. The accused must attend all court hearings without default or be represented by a duly instructed advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court ,Pune All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case