The State of Maharashtra Warje Malwadi P.Stn. vs Ajay Rama Bhalshanakr etc — 100679/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 395. Status: Hearing Before Charge. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHPU010129132015
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
106686/2015
Filing Date
29-10-2015
Registration No
100679/2015
Registration Date
30-10-2015
Court
District and Session Court ,Pune
Judge
17-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
FIR Details
FIR Number
151
Police Station
WARJE MALWADI POLICE STATION
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Warje Malwadi P.Stn.
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Ajay Rama Bhalshanakr etc
Sanjay Shankar Gokhale
Hearing History
Judge: 17-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 13-02-2026 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 30-01-2026 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 07-01-2026 | Hearing Before Charge |
Interim Orders
Summary: The bail application filed by accused Ravindra Nathu Marne and Ankush Bankat Waghmare in a robbery case (Section 395 IPC) was rejected. The court found a strong prima facie case against them, noted that investigation remained incomplete with one co-accused still absconding and crucial evidence (stolen ornaments and weapon) not yet recovered, and determined that releasing them on bail at that stage would hinder ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The bail application filed by accused Ravindra Nathu Marne and Ankush Bankat Waghmare in a robbery case (Section 395 IPC) was rejected. The court found a strong prima facie case against them, noted that investigation remained incomplete with one co-accused still absconding and crucial evidence (stolen ornaments and weapon) not yet recovered, and determined that releasing them on bail at that stage would hinder ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts