The State of Maharashtra Jejuri P.stn. vs Vasant Alias Bunty Sampat Shinde Advocate - In-Person — 476/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 452,354(A),(1)(i). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHPU010110522022
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
6026/2022
Filing Date
22-06-2022
Registration No
476/2022
Registration Date
22-06-2022
Court
District and Session Court ,Pune
Judge
12-DISTRICT JUDGE -8 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
FIR Details
FIR Number
151
Police Station
Jejuri Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Jejuri P.stn.
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Vasant Alias Bunty Sampat Shinde Advocate - In-Person
Hearing History
Judge: 12-DISTRICT JUDGE -8 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 20-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 21-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The bail application filed by accused Vasant @ Bunty Shinde under Section 439 CrPC for offences under IPC Sections 452, 354-A(i) and POCSO Act Sections 11(1), 12 has been rejected. The court found that the victim was 10 years old at the time of the incident, there is specific evidence against the accused, and since the victim and accused are neighbors, there is risk of witness intimidation and evidence tampering. The application has been disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The bail application filed by accused Vasant @ Bunty Shinde under Section 439 CrPC for offences under IPC Sections 452, 354-A(i) and POCSO Act Sections 11(1), 12 has been rejected. The court found that the victim was 10 years old at the time of the incident, there is specific evidence against the accused, and since the victim and accused are neighbors, there is risk of witness intimidation and evidence tampering. The application has been disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts