The State of Maharashtra through Jejuri Pstn vs Asif Hasan Pathan Advocate - BHALERAO VIJAY SOMNATH — 525/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354A. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHPU010098572021

Hearing

Next Hearing

27th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

6078/2021

Filing Date

12-07-2021

Registration No

525/2021

Registration Date

19-07-2021

Court

District and Session Court ,Pune

Judge

12-DISTRICT JUDGE -8 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE

FIR Details

FIR Number

129

Police Station

Jejuri Police Station

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 354A
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 9(J)(1),9(K),12

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra through Jejuri Pstn

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Asif Hasan Pathan Advocate - BHALERAO VIJAY SOMNATH

Hearing History

Judge: 12-DISTRICT JUDGE -8 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE

07-03-2026

Hearing

05-02-2026

Hearing

18-12-2025

Hearing Before Charge

03-12-2025

Hearing Before Charge

04-10-2025

N.B.W._Unready

Interim Orders

29-07-2021
Order on Exhibit

Summary: Bail was granted to accused Aasif Hasan Pathan in this child sexual abuse case. The court allowed the bail application despite prosecution objections, finding that investigation was completed with no prima facie evidence of tampering with witnesses, and prolonged custody was unjustified. Bail was granted on a Rs. 30,000 personal recognizance bond with stringent conditions including non-contact with the victim, restrictions on leaving Maharashtra, and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Bail was granted to accused Aasif Hasan Pathan in this child sexual abuse case. The court allowed the bail application despite prosecution objections, finding that investigation was completed with no prima facie evidence of tampering with witnesses, and prolonged custody was unjustified. Bail was granted on a Rs. 30,000 personal recognizance bond with stringent conditions including non-contact with the victim, restrictions on leaving Maharashtra, and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court ,Pune All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case