The State of Maharashtra Through Bundgarden P.S. vs Punaram Dhanaram Chaudhari Advocate - Gajbhiye Gopal R. — 421/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,(2)(I)(J). Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHPU010098302022

Hearing

Next Hearing

06th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

5429/2022

Filing Date

06-06-2022

Registration No

421/2022

Registration Date

07-06-2022

Court

District and Session Court ,Pune

Judge

12-DISTRICT JUDGE -8 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE

FIR Details

FIR Number

79

Police Station

Bundgarden Police Station

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 376,(2)(I)(J)
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,8,12

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra Through Bundgarden P.S.

Adv. APP and Asst, Jachak Gaurav Jaiprakash

Respondent(s)

Punaram Dhanaram Chaudhari Advocate - Gajbhiye Gopal R.

Hearing History

Judge: 12-DISTRICT JUDGE -8 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE

24-03-2026

Hearing

07-03-2026

Hearing

23-02-2026

Hearing

11-02-2026

Hearing

06-02-2026

Hearing

Interim Orders

07-10-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: The bail application filed by accused Punaram Dhanaram Chaudhari under Section 439 CrPC in a POCSO Act case involving alleged sexual assault of a 12-year-old child was rejected. The court denied bail citing the serious nature of the offense, the victim's minor age, the accused's lack of permanent residence (creating absconding risk), and the fact that charges have been framed. The prosecution was directed to expedite the trial and record the victim's statement promptly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The bail application filed by accused Punaram Dhanaram Chaudhari under Section 439 CrPC in a POCSO Act case involving alleged sexual assault of a 12-year-old child was rejected. The court denied bail citing the serious nature of the offense, the victim's minor age, the accused's lack of permanent residence (creating absconding risk), and the fact that charges have been framed. The prosecution was directed to expedite the trial and record the victim's statement promptly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court ,Pune All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case