The State of Maharashtra Through Bundgarden P.S. vs Punaram Dhanaram Chaudhari Advocate - Gajbhiye Gopal R. — 421/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,(2)(I)(J). Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHPU010098302022
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
5429/2022
Filing Date
06-06-2022
Registration No
421/2022
Registration Date
07-06-2022
Court
District and Session Court ,Pune
Judge
12-DISTRICT JUDGE -8 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
FIR Details
FIR Number
79
Police Station
Bundgarden Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through Bundgarden P.S.
Adv. APP and Asst, Jachak Gaurav Jaiprakash
Respondent(s)
Punaram Dhanaram Chaudhari Advocate - Gajbhiye Gopal R.
Hearing History
Judge: 12-DISTRICT JUDGE -8 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 23-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 11-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 06-02-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The bail application filed by accused Punaram Dhanaram Chaudhari under Section 439 CrPC in a POCSO Act case involving alleged sexual assault of a 12-year-old child was rejected. The court denied bail citing the serious nature of the offense, the victim's minor age, the accused's lack of permanent residence (creating absconding risk), and the fact that charges have been framed. The prosecution was directed to expedite the trial and record the victim's statement promptly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The bail application filed by accused Punaram Dhanaram Chaudhari under Section 439 CrPC in a POCSO Act case involving alleged sexual assault of a 12-year-old child was rejected. The court denied bail citing the serious nature of the offense, the victim's minor age, the accused's lack of permanent residence (creating absconding risk), and the fact that charges have been framed. The prosecution was directed to expedite the trial and record the victim's statement promptly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts