Nawaz Mastan Shaikh vs Central Railway, Pune Division etc Advocate - Salunkhe Mangala Ganpatrao — 14/2022

Case under Public Premises (eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act Section 9. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

Civil Appeal PPE - Civil Appeal under Public Premises Act

CNR: MHPU010091992022

Arguments

Next Hearing

07th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

4771/2022

Filing Date

20-05-2022

Registration No

14/2022

Registration Date

20-05-2022

Court

District and Session Court ,Pune

Judge

17-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE

Acts & Sections

Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act Section 9

Petitioner(s)

Nawaz Mastan Shaikh

Adv. GHADYALE SUDHINDRA MANIK

Respondent(s)

Central Railway, Pune Division etc Advocate - Salunkhe Mangala Ganpatrao

Estate Officer, Central Railway, Pune Division

Adv. Salunkhe Mangala Ganpatrao

Divisional Railway Manager, Works Division Office

Adv. Salunkhe Mangala Ganpatrao

Senior Section Engineer (W) GPR

Adv. Salunkhe Mangala Ganpatrao

Hearing History

Judge: 17-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE

07-03-2026

Arguments

16-02-2026

Arguments

28-01-2026

Arguments

22-01-2026

Arguments

17-12-2025

Arguments

Interim Orders

13-06-2024
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The District Judge rejected the appellant's application for appointment of a court receiver filed under Order XL of CPC in PPE Appeal No. 14/2022. The appellant, as legal heir of the deceased lessee, challenged the Central Railway Estate Officer's eviction order dated 10/11/2021, which classified him as an unauthorized occupant under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971. The court held that since the respondents had alleged the appellant was an unauthorized occupant, no court receiver could be appointed, and the application stood rejected on 13/06/2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Judge rejected the appellant's application for appointment of a court receiver filed under Order XL of CPC in PPE Appeal No. 14/2022. The appellant, as legal heir of the deceased lessee, challenged the Central Railway Estate Officer's eviction order dated 10/11/2021, which classified him as an unauthorized occupant under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971. The court held that since the respondents had alleged the appellant was an unauthorized occupant, no court receiver could be appointed, and the application stood rejected on 13/06/2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court ,Pune All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case