Ashok Shankar Gaikwad etc 1 vs Central Railway, Pune Division etc Advocate - Salunkhe Mangala Ganpatrao — 11/2022
Case under Public Premises (eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act Section 9. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
Civil Appeal PPE - Civil Appeal under Public Premises Act
CNR: MHPU010091482022
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4766/2022
Filing Date
19-05-2022
Registration No
11/2022
Registration Date
19-05-2022
Court
District and Session Court ,Pune
Judge
17-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashok Shankar Gaikwad etc 1
Adv. GHADYALE SUDHINDRA MANIK
Malan Ashok Gaikwad
Respondent(s)
Central Railway, Pune Division etc Advocate - Salunkhe Mangala Ganpatrao
Estate Officer, Central Railway, Pune Division
Adv. Salunkhe Mangala Ganpatrao
Divisional Railway Manager, Works Division Office
Adv. Salunkhe Mangala Ganpatrao
Senior Section Engineer (W) GPR
Adv. Salunkhe Mangala Ganpatrao
Hearing History
Judge: 17-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 16-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 28-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 22-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-12-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: The District Court rejected the appellants' application for appointment of a court receiver in their appeal against an eviction order dated 10/11/2021 passed under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971. The court found that since the legal heirs of the deceased lessee were deemed unauthorized occupants by the estate officer, no question arose for directing acceptance of license fees or appointing a receiver. The application was dismissed as the court determined that appointing a receiver was not appropriate in proceedings under the Public Premises Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Court rejected the appellants' application for appointment of a court receiver in their appeal against an eviction order dated 10/11/2021 passed under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971. The court found that since the legal heirs of the deceased lessee were deemed unauthorized occupants by the estate officer, no question arose for directing acceptance of license fees or appointing a receiver. The application was dismissed as the court determined that appointing a receiver was not appropriate in proceedings under the Public Premises Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts