Maharashtra Gandhi Smarak Nidhi etc 2 vs Govind Jainarayan Jaiswal Advocate - Hartalkar Abhijit Mukund — 100331/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING on 01st April 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHPU010065832015
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
103376/2015
Filing Date
15-06-2015
Registration No
100331/2015
Registration Date
23-06-2015
Court
District and Session Court ,Pune
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maharashtra Gandhi Smarak Nidhi etc 2
Adv. Akolkar Vidya Manohar
Kumar Saptarshi
Adv. Akolkar Vidya Manohar
Anwar Abdul Aziz Riyaz
Adv. Akolkar Vidya Manohar
Respondent(s)
Govind Jainarayan Jaiswal Advocate - Hartalkar Abhijit Mukund
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 07-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 02-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Principal District Judge dismissed the Maharashtra Gandhi Smarak Niddhi Trust's appeal seeking possession of rented property from Dr. Govind Jaiswal. The court found that the trust failed to prove the defendant was illegally using the property, had made unauthorized constructions, sub-let the premises, or that possession was bona fide required; additionally, the defendant deposited outstanding rent within the statutory period and would face greater hardship if evicted while running a nature cure center (Nisargoupchar Kendra) on the premises for years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal District Judge dismissed the Maharashtra Gandhi Smarak Niddhi Trust's appeal seeking possession of rented property from Dr. Govind Jaiswal. The court found that the trust failed to prove the defendant was illegally using the property, had made unauthorized constructions, sub-let the premises, or that possession was bona fide required; additionally, the defendant deposited outstanding rent within the statutory period and would face greater hardship if evicted while running a nature cure center (Nisargoupchar Kendra) on the premises for years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts