The State of Maharashtra Through Hinjewadi P Stn vs Sumegh Sunil Joshi etc — 254/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420. Status: Hearing Before Charge. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHPU010062242022
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3183/2022
Filing Date
04-04-2022
Registration No
254/2022
Registration Date
05-04-2022
Court
District and Session Court ,Pune
Judge
17-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
FIR Details
FIR Number
44
Police Station
Hinjawadi Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through Hinjewadi P Stn
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sumegh Sunil Joshi etc
Sakshi Joshi -Not Arrested
Darmesh Desai - (Abscond)
Anurag Sharma-(Abscond)
Hearing History
Judge: 17-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 20-03-2026 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 20-02-2026 | Hearing Before Charge |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by accused Sumegh Sunil Joshi under Section 439(1)(b) of Cr.P.C. seeking relaxation of bail conditions was rejected. The accused had been granted conditional bail in November 2023 requiring deposit of Rs. 27 lakhs immediately and Rs. 27 lakhs within nine months in installments, but failed to deposit any amount for over a year. The court found no grounds to relax the condition due to the accused's breach of court orders, lack of compliance, and risk of absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by accused Sumegh Sunil Joshi under Section 439(1)(b) of Cr.P.C. seeking relaxation of bail conditions was rejected. The accused had been granted conditional bail in November 2023 requiring deposit of Rs. 27 lakhs immediately and Rs. 27 lakhs within nine months in installments, but failed to deposit any amount for over a year. The court found no grounds to relax the condition due to the accused's breach of court orders, lack of compliance, and risk of absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts