The State of Maharashtra Hinjawadi P.Stn. vs Sumegh Sunil Joshi etc Advocate - Ghuge Shrikrushan Fulchand — 211/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420. Status: Hearing Before Charge. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHPU010046822022
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2407/2022
Filing Date
11-03-2022
Registration No
211/2022
Registration Date
16-03-2022
Court
District and Session Court ,Pune
Judge
17-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
FIR Details
FIR Number
821
Police Station
Hinjawadi Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Hinjawadi P.Stn.
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Sumegh Sunil Joshi etc Advocate - Ghuge Shrikrushan Fulchand
Sakshi Sunil Joshi (Not Arrested)
Neha Patel (Absconding)
Anurag Sharma (Absconding)
Hearing History
Judge: 17-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 20-03-2026 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 20-02-2026 | Hearing Before Charge |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: Accused Sakshi Sumegh Joshi's discharge application under Section 227 CrPC was rejected. The court found prima facie material against her in a financial fraud case involving a Meta Trader 5 share trading scheme where investors were allegedly lured with false promises of lucrative returns. The court held that charges under IPC Sections 406, 420 and MPID Act, 1999 would proceed to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: Accused Sakshi Sumegh Joshi's discharge application under Section 227 CrPC was rejected. The court found prima facie material against her in a financial fraud case involving a Meta Trader 5 share trading scheme where investors were allegedly lured with false promises of lucrative returns. The court held that charges under IPC Sections 406, 420 and MPID Act, 1999 would proceed to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts