Jeevan Pramod Ingole vs State Of Maharashtra Through Sahakarnagar Police Station etc Advocate - APP — 1262/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 02nd April 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHPU010029582026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
2076/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
1262/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
District and Session Court ,Pune
Judge
12-DISTRICT JUDGE -8 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL REFUSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
45
Police Station
Sahakarnagar Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jeevan Pramod Ingole
Adv. Ghadage Chaitanya Machindra
Respondent(s)
State Of Maharashtra Through Sahakarnagar Police Station etc Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Original Complainant / Victim
Hearing History
Judge: 12-DISTRICT JUDGE -8 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Disposed
Order
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 28-03-2026 | Order | |
| 25-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 18-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 13-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court rejected Jeevan Pramod Ingole's bail application in a case involving charges under BNS, ITPA, and POCSO Act for alleged trafficking and sexual exploitation of a 16-year-old minor. The court found the offence serious and noted that investigation was ongoing with references to 17 other potential victims, making custody necessary for thorough investigation despite the accused's claim of limited role. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court rejected Jeevan Pramod Ingole's bail application in a case involving charges under BNS, ITPA, and POCSO Act for alleged trafficking and sexual exploitation of a 16-year-old minor. The court found the offence serious and noted that investigation was ongoing with references to 17 other potential victims, making custody necessary for thorough investigation despite the accused's claim of limited role. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts