Sharad Sopan Jare vs State of Maharashtra Through Hinjawadi Police Station etc Advocate - APP — 1078/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 31st March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHPU010025532026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
1788/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
1078/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court ,Pune
Judge
12-DISTRICT JUDGE -8 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
99
Police Station
Hinjawadi Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sharad Sopan Jare
Adv. Kawade Sagar Sunil
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Hinjawadi Police Station etc Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Original Complainant
Hearing History
Judge: 12-DISTRICT JUDGE -8 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Disposed
Order
Order
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-03-2026 | Order | |
| 27-03-2026 | Order | |
| 24-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted bail to Sharad Sopan Jare in a case involving charges under BNS (assault), SCST Act (caste-based abuse), POCSO, and JJ Act, finding inconsistencies in the complainant's evolving statements and noting the husband's initial inability to identify the accused. The bail was conditional upon furnishing a ₹50,000 bond with surety, with restrictions against tampering with evidence, contacting victims, and leaving Maharashtra without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted bail to Sharad Sopan Jare in a case involving charges under BNS (assault), SCST Act (caste-based abuse), POCSO, and JJ Act, finding inconsistencies in the complainant's evolving statements and noting the husband's initial inability to identify the accused. The bail was conditional upon furnishing a ₹50,000 bond with surety, with restrictions against tampering with evidence, contacting victims, and leaving Maharashtra without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts