Shoib Rashid Qureshi vs State of Maharashtra Through Khadki Police Station Advocate - APP — 984/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,352,351(2),324,3(5). Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 07th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHPU010023422026
e-Filing Number
20-02-2026
Filing Number
1661/2026
Filing Date
21-02-2026
Registration No
984/2026
Registration Date
21-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court ,Pune
Judge
12-DISTRICT JUDGE -8 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
349
Police Station
Khadki Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shoib Rashid Qureshi
Adv. BHALERAO SAURABH VIJAY
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Khadki Police Station Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 12-DISTRICT JUDGE -8 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Disposed
Order
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | Order | |
| 27-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 25-02-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 21-02-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Pune granted bail to Shoib Rashid Qureshi in a violent assault case. The court found insufficient evidence directly linking him to the attack—the FIR showed only two of four accused were identified as actual assailants, no test identification parade was conducted, and no recovery was made from him. Considering the charge-sheet submission, his peripheral role (merely being present), and that a co-accused with similar involvement was already released on bail, the court approved his release on Rs. 50,000 surety with conditions including court attendance, non-contact with witnesses, and area restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Pune granted bail to Shoib Rashid Qureshi in a violent assault case. The court found insufficient evidence directly linking him to the attack—the FIR showed only two of four accused were identified as actual assailants, no test identification parade was conducted, and no recovery was made from him. Considering the charge-sheet submission, his peripheral role (merely being present), and that a co-accused with similar involvement was already released on bail, the court approved his release on Rs. 50,000 surety with conditions including court attendance, non-contact with witnesses, and area restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts