The State of Maharashtra Through Hadapsar p.S. vs Krishna Vitthal Rekhale Advocate - Ahmed Rizwan Jaan Mohammed — 161/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: MHPU010021982023

Hearing

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

960/2023

Filing Date

25-01-2023

Registration No

161/2023

Registration Date

27-01-2023

Court

District and Session Court ,Pune

Judge

17-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE

FIR Details

FIR Number

1219

Police Station

Hadapsar Police Station

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 302
Maharashtra Police Act Section 37(1),r/w135

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra Through Hadapsar p.S.

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Krishna Vitthal Rekhale Advocate - Ahmed Rizwan Jaan Mohammed

Hearing History

Judge: 17-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE

25-03-2026

Hearing

07-03-2026

Hearing

20-02-2026

Awaiting Muddemal

06-02-2026

Production of Accused

21-01-2026

Production of Accused

Interim Orders

13-06-2024
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The bail application of Krushna Vitthal Rekhale, charged with murder (IPC §302) in connection with the death of Sagar Gaikwad on 25.09.2022, has been rejected. The court found prima facie evidence of intentional murder based on eyewitness accounts showing the accused deliberately assaulted the victim with stone and bamboo, and rejected the defense argument of provocation, noting the accused's previous criminal history and risk of witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The bail application of Krushna Vitthal Rekhale, charged with murder (IPC §302) in connection with the death of Sagar Gaikwad on 25.09.2022, has been rejected. The court found prima facie evidence of intentional murder based on eyewitness accounts showing the accused deliberately assaulted the victim with stone and bamboo, and rejected the defense argument of provocation, noting the accused's previous criminal history and risk of witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court ,Pune All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case