The State of Maharashtra Velha P.S. vs Akash Hanumant Ingulkar Advocate - Purohit Yashpal Dattaprasad — 90/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354(a),376. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHPU010020532020
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
950/2020
Filing Date
03-02-2020
Registration No
90/2020
Registration Date
05-02-2020
Court
District and Session Court ,Pune
Judge
136-DISTRICT JUDGE -7 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
FIR Details
FIR Number
69
Police Station
Velha Police Station
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Velha P.S.
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Akash Hanumant Ingulkar Advocate - Purohit Yashpal Dattaprasad
Hearing History
Judge: 136-DISTRICT JUDGE -7 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Defence Evidence
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 27-03-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 20-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
BAIL DENIED Aakash Hanumant Ingulkar's bail application under Section 439 CrPC was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune on 06/08/2022. The accused was charged with sexual assault of a 5-year-old girl under IPC Sections 354A, 376, and POCSO Act Sections 4, 6, 8, and 12. The court found the offense serious (Section 376AB), noting medical evidence corroborated the assault and that the accused allegedly transmitted HIV to the victim, warranting denial of bail due to witness tampering risks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
BAIL DENIED Aakash Hanumant Ingulkar's bail application under Section 439 CrPC was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune on 06/08/2022. The accused was charged with sexual assault of a 5-year-old girl under IPC Sections 354A, 376, and POCSO Act Sections 4, 6, 8, and 12. The court found the offense serious (Section 376AB), noting medical evidence corroborated the assault and that the accused allegedly transmitted HIV to the victim, warranting denial of bail due to witness tampering risks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts