Vipesh Vinayak Salvi vs State of Maharashtra Through State Excise Police Station Advocate - APP — 773/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHPU010018492026
e-Filing Number
06-02-2026
Filing Number
1291/2026
Filing Date
09-02-2026
Registration No
773/2026
Registration Date
09-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court ,Pune
Judge
8-DISTRICT JUDGE -6 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
46
Police Station
STATE EXCISE
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vipesh Vinayak Salvi
Adv. D LIMA DON JOHN JOSSEY
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through State Excise Police Station Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 8-DISTRICT JUDGE -6 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Order | |
| 02-03-2026 | Order | |
| 24-02-2026 | Order | |
| 16-02-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted anticipatory bail to Vipesh Vinayak Salvi, accused of purchasing prohibited liquor (worth Rs.88,56,000) transported from Goa to Maharashtra. The court found that since nothing needed to be recovered from the applicant and he was only required for interrogation, detention was unnecessary—suitable bail conditions with a Rs.30,000 bond and cooperation requirements would suffice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court granted anticipatory bail to Vipesh Vinayak Salvi, accused of purchasing prohibited liquor (worth Rs.88,56,000) transported from Goa to Maharashtra. The court found that since nothing needed to be recovered from the applicant and he was only required for interrogation, detention was unnecessary—suitable bail conditions with a Rs.30,000 bond and cooperation requirements would suffice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts