The State of Maharashtra Warje Malwadi P.Stn. vs Rohidas Gorakshnath Hulmukhe Advocate - Swami Sachin Dayanand — 6/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,376(2)(N),506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th March 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHPU010000992022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
47/2022
Filing Date
03-01-2022
Registration No
6/2022
Registration Date
03-01-2022
Court
District and Session Court ,Pune
Judge
12-DISTRICT JUDGE -8 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
379
Police Station
WARJE MALWADI POLICE STATION
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Warje Malwadi P.Stn.
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Rohidas Gorakshnath Hulmukhe Advocate - Swami Sachin Dayanand
Hearing History
Judge: 12-DISTRICT JUDGE -8 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Disposed
Evidence Part Heard
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 18-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 03-01-2026 | Hearing | |
| 11-11-2025 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Special Judge at Pune acquitted Rohidas Gorakshanath Hulmukhe of charges under IPC Sections 376, 376(2)(n), 506 and POCSO Act Sections 3, 4, 5(l), 6. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged incident and crucially, both key witnesses (the victim and her aunt) denied the allegations during trial, leaving no substantive evidence to support the rape charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Special Judge at Pune acquitted Rohidas Gorakshanath Hulmukhe of charges under IPC Sections 376, 376(2)(n), 506 and POCSO Act Sections 3, 4, 5(l), 6. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged incident and crucially, both key witnesses (the victim and her aunt) denied the allegations during trial, leaving no substantive evidence to support the rape charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts