Sagar Kavitake etc vs Sheetal Kavitake Advocate - Deshmukh Sudarshan Dilip — 17/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 07th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHPU010000392026
e-Filing Number
30-12-2025
Filing Number
23/2026
Filing Date
01-Jan-2026
Registration No
17/2026
Registration Date
03-Jan-2026
Court
District and Session Court ,Pune
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge Pune
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 06-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sagar Kavitake etc
Adv. Sonar Rakesh Baburao
-
2.Meena Vilas Kavitake
Adv. Sonar Rakesh Baburao
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sheetal Kavitake Advocate - Deshmukh Sudarshan Dilip
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The court allowed the transfer application and transferred PWDVA Appeal No.143/2025 from District Judge-20 to District Judge-18 in Pune, where the related PWDVA Appeal No.95/2024 is pending. Both appeals will now be decided by the same court (Judge K. P. Kshirsagar) on their own merits, with the opponent raising no objection to the consolidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District And Sessions Judge Pune
-
21-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
Principal District And Sessions Judge Pune
-
06-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
Principal District And Sessions Judge Pune
-
27-Jan-2026
Reply/Say
Principal District And Sessions Judge Pune
-
19-Jan-2026
Awaiting Notice
Principal District And Sessions Judge Pune
-
06-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 17/2026
The court allowed the transfer application and transferred PWDVA Appeal No.143/2025 from District Judge-20 to District Judge-18 in Pune, where the related PWDVA Appeal No.95/2024 is pending. Both appeals will now be decided by the same court (Judge K. P. Kshirsagar) on their own merits, with the opponent raising no objection to the consolidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts