Ramprasad Sopanrao More vs Nill — 311/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2,3. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 16th June 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHPA150019562025
e-Filing Number
19-12-2025
Filing Number
629/2025
Filing Date
19-Dec-2025
Registration No
311/2025
Registration Date
19-Dec-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sailu
Judge
3-Extra Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Sailu
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramprasad Sopanrao More
Adv. GADHWAL AMIT CHETAN
-
2.Dnyaneshwar Sopanrao More
Adv. GADHWAL AMIT CHETAN
-
3.Lakhan Tukaram More
Adv. GADHWAL AMIT CHETAN
-
4.Ram Tukaram More
Adv. GADHWAL AMIT CHETAN
-
5.Lakshmibai Pramod Fulage
Adv. GADHWAL AMIT CHETAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nill
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Order on Exhibit
The court partially granted the succession certificate petition filed by the three petitioners (Ramprasad, Dnyaneshwar, and Lakhan More) under the Mumbai Civil Regulation, 1827. The court determined that petitioners 1-5 are legal heirs of the deceased Sopanrao Bidoba More and Gangubai, but only petitioners 3-5 are qualified to obtain succession certificates as they are closer heirs in the legal succession order compared to petitioners 1-2. The court issued succession certificates recognizing the petitioners' heirship status for managing the deceased's estate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Disposed
Extra Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Sailu
-
18-Apr-2026
Arguments
Extra Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Sailu
-
20-Mar-2026
Public Notice/Proclamation
Extra Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Sailu
-
18-Feb-2026
Public Notice/Proclamation
Extra Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Sailu
-
03-Feb-2026
Public Notice/Proclamation
Extra Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Sailu
-
19-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 311/2025
The court partially granted the succession certificate petition filed by the three petitioners (Ramprasad, Dnyaneshwar, and Lakhan More) under the Mumbai Civil Regulation, 1827. The court determined that petitioners 1-5 are legal heirs of the deceased Sopanrao Bidoba More and Gangubai, but only petitioners 3-5 are qualified to obtain succession certificates as they are closer heirs in the legal succession order compared to petitioners 1-2. The court issued succession certificates recognizing the petitioners' heirship status for managing the deceased's estate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts